- Enumeration: We do not yet know the basics. What is a public health nurse? Where are they located? Who calls themselves by this name and how many of us are there? The enumeration group is working on the very basics of identifying and counting public health nurses in all their locales in the US.
- Public Health Accreditation: Kaye Bender gave some insights into the value of accreditation. I see public health accreditation as in its infancy. As many other competing factors take the dollar in public health will accreditation actually result in "value added" to local public health? We are the cowboys of nursing. We take to the range and get the job done whatever it is. It's great, and also may be barrier to a thoughtful and deliberative process of accreditation...and it is very, very expensive for a super limited local health department budget. We'll see how this develops!
- The Quad Council: Lots of discussion was held on the competency framework. I have read them, digested them and the competencies do outline the things we do and think about each day. The difficulty is that there is a huge disconnect between the competencies and identifying these in relationship to the essential services of public health. In the meantime, we keep doing the job and doing it well.
- Why a nurse? A lot of attention was drawn to the profession's relative inability to articulate why a public health nurse should serve in their community instead of a more economical PH graduate. We ought to be better at this! Is it humility? Lack of clarity? The fact that nobody would actually believe the scope of our daily practice? Many of the nurses I work with devalue their contributions every day. We need a dose of bravado. The "Oh, it's nothing really" approach leads stakeholders to think..."Public health nursing? Oh...it's nothing....really!"
- Education for nursing students: This is a huge area for me in local public health. With perhaps 100 or more BSN nursing students in my jurisdiction how am I to support each and every one with a competent, engaging PHN rotation while I am responsible to the taxpayers to actually provide an expertly delivered service? Crickets chirping when I ask this question! One very intriguing concept is the academic health department. This seminar allowed the chance to learn about some alternatives such as this model and also simulation of PH scenarios in practice. How could it be funded?
In public health nursing we are not data or research-rich. We have to get better at knowing what works and replicating it. On the other hand (in my opinion) the evidence based programs available, such as the nurse-family partnership are far, far too costly and data-driven for a public health agency with a generalist staff, such as my own. We keep a lot of data and share it widely. That is pretty rare from what I see in county health departments.
Yes we need funding. Yet I see other agencies chasing grant dollars without any passion for the actual work that they will have to perform. Isn't there some happy medium we could reach? We also ARE funded to do some of the work. Couldn't we do this work better instead of wishing away all of our professional lives to have more?
Finally, whether it is systems work, education partnerships, community coalitions, etc. it all still boils down to hard work and looking across the table at our public and our partners to gain understanding... and each other's phone numbers.